Silverado With White Rims

spring nuclear

seen that despite the tragedy that is unfolding in Japan and despite the foolishness of the idea from the start, are trying in every way to rip off the public opinion in pro nuclear power, I try to write a bit 'of questions of the servant, or man in the street, or someone who knows nothing and is based on bits and pieces that picks up around.

1) Nuclear power in Italy was defeated by a referendum in 1987. I do not know that the referenda decay in value over time. Otherwise, even the status of our Democratic Republic is in peril.

2) Germany, the economically most productive in Europe, plans to gradually decommission nuclear power plants until the complete closure within twenty years. It follows that they are already focusing on other types of energy resources.

3) If Italy insisted on this line would be able to set up plants in the best case in twenty years, when nuclear power will most likely already passed and the most technologically advanced other forms of energy will sustain.

4) The problem of waste. No one knows how to dispose of them. Italy are still circulating in those twenty-five years ago. In the U.S., is seeking more than ten years to build a disposal center in Yucca, near Las Vegas, but so far without success. We may be how we organize to deal with this?

5) We are not able to handle ordinary trash, we were not able to spread the culture of recycling in all areas of the country, why in heaven's name, we should instead be able to dispose of radioactive waste?

6) Of course, when this story went in port, there would be a massive run-up to speculation and hoarding business area of \u200b\u200bprocurement, who would ensure the quality, timing and certainty of the results? Let us remember the dire state of our logistics (see Salerno - Reggio Calabria and the like) and the pathological inability to keep Italian firms out of public malfeasance.

Ranch King Snow Blowers

another idea of \u200b\u200bwealth

the Italian Constitution, Art. 9

The Republic promotes the development of culture and scientific and technical research. Protecting the landscape and the historical and artistic heritage of the nation.

remember well these words. Let us remember well where they come from and in what spirit they were written. Before you say that Italy repudiates war as an instrument of aggression against the freedom of other peoples (Article 11), first to specify that personal freedom is inviolable (art. 13), the Constitution provides that the culture, research and the historical, artistic and landscape of the nation should be protected and promoted. As good of all, I humbly add, and I do not think of betraying the spirit of the Constitution. This paper, in addition to being the dam more solid we have to face of legal barbarism, it also recognizes our right to enjoy the beauty in which we live is not a minor detail. Assign a value to the legal and legal policy automatically mean beauty, and which seem happy to move, to ban speculation, looting, plundering the wealth of all the particular cultural and artistic, in which Italy has its roots. The founding fathers wisely took into account the possible looting of the territory, mass rape, which would deprive a large part of citizenship as a common good. We know how that turned out: we see every day as the Italian artistic patrimony is not only increasingly prey to wretched speculation, but also of neglect, indifference and ignorance, even by those who, in the role government should protect this wealth, raise and make it more usable by every citizen. And not only Italian, since much of this beauty is the patrimony of humanity. It 'nice to see how our cultural heritage is really ours, and not some rich master, our , with all the implications and responsibilities that this concept includes, to the point that if it were to deteriorate or fall prey the concrete casting of some jackal authorized, we could not call out saying, cowardly: I have no claim. The Constitution, enshrining a right, also reminds us of a duty.